An examination of Paul Scholes' return and his impact on Manchester United's midfield
Absence makes the heart grow fonder. That certainly was the case for Paul Scholes. However, it has been 39 days since the return of the midfield maestro from premature retirement and I don't think the fondness for him has subsided one bit for Manchester United supporters during this time.
Since Scholesy's return, United have been involved in 5 Premier League matches and 2 FA Cup ties -- and he's played a part in every single one of them. In those 7 contests, United have won 5 of them and only lost once -- the 1 loss was at Anfield in a match that United clearly outclassed Liverpool FC in. United's recent good form occurring since Scholes' return is not a coincidence. His impact has been far greater than even the most realistic optimist could have imagined.
After his initial appearance versus Manchester City on January 8, it was clear still that his technical ability was matched by only a few in the footballing world. The man dubbed 'Sat Nav' by teammates -- because of the incredible precision he displayed when picking out a pass anywhere on the pitch -- came on as a substitute in the 59th minute at the Etihad and he immediately pulled the strings as he completed an incredible 73 passes at a 97% success rate. However, expectations going forward were still modest because this was a 37-year-old player coming out of retirement and one that professed that his legs were gone last Spring.
After the City match, I wrote this piece suggesting that Scholes could be a useful squad player by coming on late to kill off matches by playing 'keep-ball' (*). While I anticipated that he would make the occasional start, it seemed reasonable to expect that his main role would be as an effective 'closer' late in games as a possession-based midfielder. Scholes did this in the City game, just as he did at the Emirates versus Arsenal on January 22, but his overall impact has been greater than this so far.
(*) The linked piece provides more tactical detail about Scholes and supplements this piece well. It would be rather redundant to repeat the same here.
To put it frankly, Scholes has absolutely dictated every single one of the four matches that he's started in since his comeback. In each of these matches, his midfield partner has been Michael Carrick and together, they've helped United play possession-based football. In the four matches that Scholes has started, United's ball possession in each of those encounters has been 63%, 57%, 75%, and 55% -- two of those matches have been against rival Liverpool. United's season average in Premier League action is 56.2% -- a number that has risen because of Scholes' return.
Here is a match-by-match and season-total chart of Scholes' passing statistics:
|
Opponent |
Date |
Prem or FA Cup |
Passes completed/attempts |
Pass Success % |
Minutes |
|
City (a) |
1/8 |
FA |
71/73 |
97% |
32+ |
|
Bolton |
1/14 |
Prem |
38/42 |
90% |
68+ |
|
Arsenal (a) |
1/22 |
Prem |
10/12 |
83% |
16+ |
|
Liverpool (a) |
1/28 |
FA |
94/100 |
94% |
90+ |
|
1/31 |
Prem |
113/126 |
90% |
90+ |
|
|
Chelsea (a) |
2/5 |
Prem |
24/27 |
89% |
26+ |
|
Liverpool |
2/11 |
Prem |
87/95 |
92% |
90+ |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
437/475 |
92% |
397+ |
At season's beginning, United played dynamic football in a fast and fluid 4-4-2 -- with Tom Cleverley and Anderson as the midfield duo. Despite the wins and goals piling up, United alarmingly had conceded the joint-most shots of any side in the Premier League by early October. This resulted because the gap between Cleverley/Ando and United's center-backs was simply too large. FC Basel and Chelsea exposed United but City set Old Trafford ablaze when their 'interiores' that day tore United apart in that space between the lines.
Three reasons partially explained this vulnerability: (1) Ando and Cleverley had a good understanding with each other -- one would go forward while the other covered -- but neither was a holding player and thus, space was left in behind them. (2) Rio Ferdinand, and to a lesser extent Nemanja Vidic, didn't adjust by playing higher (in order to compact the lines) because both are vulnerable on the turn due to limited pace. (3) United's back four was constantly changing due to injury so no continuity was established.
As a result, Michael Carrick was reintroduced as first-choice midfielder in November and the cerebral midfielder has played every single league minute since. Sir Alex Ferguson opted for calm and for a player that would help keep the defense and midfield lines more compact. For awhile, United frustrated their supporters as they continually clawed and scratched their way to 1-0 results -- but those were vital points picked up that kept them afloat in the title race. United were less fluid in attack, but they were more structurally sound. This was aided by Wayne Rooney beginning to drop deeper than he was earlier in the season -- United are currently a side that is reliant on his ball-winning ability.
Enter Scholes. This completed United's recent transition to being a possession-based side with two deep central-midfielders. Carrick and Scholes essentially act as 'double-pivots' -- their deep positioning limits the gap between the lines while it also allows them more time on the ball to distribute. The duo's intelligence and range of passing allows each to choose when to pass short, pass long, pass quickly, or when to establish calm -- essentially they are able to control a match by dictating it's tempo. Rooney's willingness to track back and be combative in the center of the park helps free up these two deep-lying playmakers.
This doesn't make them rigid nor prevent them from being dynamic though. Scholes/Carrick share a similar understanding to the Cleverley/Ando partnership. The former partnership is based deeper positionally but they too are interchangeable and get forward for late-arriving runs into the box. The chalkboard below -- from the recent Stoke match -- does well to show how both Scholes and Carrick get up-and-down and side-to-side. Their movement is good and their ability to take up smart positions make them difficult to deal with. Perhaps more simply, notice how similar their chalkboards are and how much of the pitch they cover.
Going forward, what should we still worry about? Well first of all, enjoy this. It is an absolute treat right now watching the legend display such class at 37-years-old -- so much so that Harry Redknapp is already discussing bringing Scholes into the England squad for Euro 2012 if the Spurs manager gets the job.
There are three things I'll be keeping an eye out for though: (1) Scholes has fresh legs now and he's dictating matches from deep as he did in August and September of 2010. However, his influence diminished as the season wore on and this coincides to when he felt his legs had left him. Fergie will surely monitor his minutes and fitness but this is all important to keep in mind if we're expecting Scholesy to keep up the quality of his past month. (2) The other concern I have is against sides that intently press United high up the pitch. So far, opponents have defended deep against the United duo and allowed them time on the ball. How will they respond if they're actively pressed? In the 2-1 league loss last season at Stamford Bridge, Chelsea continually pressed and by the 2nd-half, Scholes and Carrick began to lose control of the match (one that they were previously controlling -- did they tire?) and were eventually overrun. (3) And lastly, how will Scholes partner with Cleverley, Anderson, and Phil Jones? So far, it has been Carrick that has been Scholes partner for every match during his return.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Best case scenario would be for the kids to learn from the master...
and adjust their roles once they all come back. Learn to be disciplined during games. Maybe Jones, Anderson, or even Fletcher (don’t forget about him) learns to be the deep lying cover for the back four. I think Fletcher has that in him already, just ask Arsene Wenger.
Obviously, I’m talking more about next year. As far as this year goes, I think once the younger players get healthy, you pair a younger player with scholes so they can learn.
by Amen Amachigh on Feb 15, 2012 11:26 AM GMT via Android app reply actions
Fletcher and Jones
Both are certainly useful players because of the energy and bite that they provide. Positionally in midfield, both are capable of lying deeper or playing in box-to-box roles. Fabio Capello even stated how impressed he was with Jones’ tidy distribution in midfield. However, neither can offer the same range of passing and vision of Scholes — and to a lesser extent, Carrick. Although both Fletch and Jones are good at not giving the ball away — both are more functional players in midfield rather than creators or players that dictate matches. Put them alongside a passer (or passers in a midfield trio) and theoretically, you have a midfield that works.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
Rooney is our team's best passer
…after scholes that is.
Wayne seems to be walking the ‘Scholesey’ path. Scholesey started off as a second striker and gradually moved deeper into midfield as time went by.
by brandding on Feb 16, 2012 2:53 AM GMT via mobile up reply actions
Rooney was very good I thought those few games he played this season in central-midfield… as a box-to-box player. His close control isn’t as good as Scholes and he’s dispossessed easier … but then again, not many can match Scholes in that.
For the time being, I like Rooney where he is now… he’s a world-class player that operates between the lines. I’m more worried about finding another player for next season that can dictate matches from deeper. I’d love for us to defeat Ajax and have Atletico Bilbao advance as well. Then all United fans could get a closer look at Javi Martinez.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
I didn't respond to this in the Rooney article but will here.
FC Basel and Chelsea exposed United but City set Old Trafford ablaze when their ‘interiores’ that day tore United apart in that space between the lines.
While I agree a lot of shots were conceded through September, the play on the field changed dramatically after the Cleverley injury. I am having a hard time sorting what was the catalyst for the change in form. I have been waiting to see Tom’s full time return to action and decide from there.
18-3 GD vs the likes of Spurs, WBA, Arsenal, Bolton and a 7-3 in the next 4 PL games(albeit vs a slight step up in comp). This coincided with conceding 84 shots and 32 on target for the 1st 4 and 67(21) in the second 4. The shots for United also changed dramatically post injury. They went from 73(31) to 59(16).
Again, I want to see what route Sir Alex decides to go with a fully fit Cleverley. I got the impression through September that he was content to concede hopeful shots knowing that United had the quality to create and convert at a higher rate. The squad appeared to take the same approach after Cleverley went down but the results were no where close to the same, as evidenced above.
While I agree a lot of shots were conceded through September, the play on the field changed dramatically after the Cleverley injury. I am having a hard time sorting what was the catalyst for the change in form. I have been waiting to see Tom’s full time return to action and decide from there.
18-3 GD vs the likes of Spurs, WBA, Arsenal, Bolton and a 7-3 in the next 4 PL games(albeit vs a slight step up in comp). This coincided with conceding 84 shots and 32 on target for the 1st 4 and 67(21) in the second 4. The shots for United also changed dramatically post injury. They went from 73(31) to 59(16).
As you said, the competition was very weak. Arsenal and Spurs were poor sides at that time as they dealt with their August transfer sagas. The shots conceded — it’s not really a matter of agreeing or disagreeing… that linked Zonal Marking piece in here was written when United had conceded the joint-most shots in league at that point. The catalyst in change in form most certainly had to do with Cleverley being out — he was an important part of the attack. However, the openness in the back was still alarming and it still occurred with him in the lineup. After he was out, there happened to be a step-up in opposition quality and we were horribly exposed: Chelsea, Basel, and obviously City. To say that wouldn’t have happened with Cleverley is impossible to say but it was still likely because of our open approach at the time.
Again, I want to see what route Sir Alex decides to go with a fully fit Cleverley. I got the impression through September that he was content to concede hopeful shots knowing that United had the quality to create and convert at a higher rate. The squad appeared to take the same approach after Cleverley went down but the results were no where close to the same, as evidenced above.
I think you’re spot-on here. Our tactics have shifted since Cleverley got injured — I think it very much was the plan at the time to win shootouts. That’s certainly a valid approach to take if you feel you’re taking on an inferior side, but it exposes you badly against tougher competition. Fergie seems to take a more pragmatic approach now but I’d like to see how Cleverley does alongside Carrick — a positionally sound CM alongside a more adventurous one.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
center-backs
I only briefly touched on it in this piece but who your back 4 are plays an important part. Quite obviously, every single one of your 10 outfield players has an effect on every other player. Had United deployed a higher line when the Cleverley/Ando duo played in behind the fluid front 4 at the time (Rooney, Welbeck, Young, Nani), then the gap between the midfield and defensive lines wouldn’t have been as large. I strongly feel the space between the lines has been United’s biggest vulnerability for the past few seasons. However, with Vidic and Rio being vulnerable on the turn due to their limited pace, a high-line (so that you can compact the space b/t the lines) is a risky way of playing because of the threat of balls being played in behind them (Vida: see West Ham last season).
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
What about playing Jones with Vida...
Obviously this is a next season solution…but Jones has the speed, that if the line is high, he can cover if vidic is beaten….?
by Amen Amachigh on Feb 15, 2012 5:36 PM GMT via Android app up reply actions
I actually like the Smalling/Evans partnership right now
I’m sure Jones will end up being a fabulous CB someday — if that actually is where he ends up — but I do worry for now about his positioning and his aerial ability. However, his debut performance for Blackburn vs Didier Drogba is something I’ll never forget. Jones handled himself incredibly well against maybe the most physically intimidating CF in the Premier League.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
Jones's
Debut against Drogba was amazing
by Sweet science on Feb 16, 2012 10:55 AM GMT up reply actions
Vidic
I have a feeling that’ll we have to be patient with Vida next season… might take him some time to find full fitness and form, despite the incredible advances in modern medicine. I think the club should plan to have 4 other center-backs ready to go at season’s beginning.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB
About centre midfield pairings at United
Anderson and Cleverley worked earlier in the season when our atacking tempos are high and we had no regards for defensive work on our own end. Carrick and Scholes/Giggs pairings work too, when we’re putting more emphasis on possession and our build ups are slow.
Now… I wouldn’t bet on giggsy and scholesey to bail us out again next season (the season when we will win all the bloody trophies!!!), and Anderson being Anderson, the need of a consistent pairing in the middle of the pitch is increasing by day. I personally would like to see whether Cleverley and Carrick can work for us. Carrick has great positional sense on the defensive end, and Cleverley has the world class ability to always make himself available when in attack. I hope we get to see this pairing soon (at least try it out this season… Like tonight)
by brandding on Feb 16, 2012 3:13 AM GMT via mobile reply actions
I agree with almost all of this
In addition, even though we only saw it just briefly (2 games?), the Carrick/Jones partnership looked really promising as well.
Editor-in-Chief for The Busby Babe | SB Nation Soccer Contributor
http://twitter.com/#!/GeneUmTBB

by 












